I’ve so far played through the Alpha campaign, just started on Beta and with Gamma still to come, and it’s been pretty consistent throughout. Though, in raw terms there doesn’t seem to be all that much content. It might be possible to miss one or two if you’re not thorough, but, eh, you know me…
Unfortunately, the campaign is completely linear, so there’s no choosing what tech to go after and thereby personalising your forces further (beyond choosing what to research immediately and what to queue up for later), but at least there’s a solid narrative justification for progress.
WARZONE 2100 CONTROLS UPGRADE
Instead of only being able to upgrade armour once in mission one but somehow twice in mission three, you are limited by what what technologies you’ve scavenged up to that point in the plot.
The entire theme of the campaign is recovering “pre-Collapse” technology in a post-apocalyptic world, which plays nicely into limiting the tech tree to stages that are ultimately analogous to the arbitrary limits of traditional RTS campaigns. Most of these holiday missions bring in new technologies to research, so a following home base objective is a welcome opportunity to try out some new toys. Jumping between totally distinct areas and numerous expansion stages stops the campaign from becoming too monotonous and keeps things fresh - and it means you can really get attached to your base as you need to expand its fortifications to respond to each threat. The enemy sometimes get cute little incidental buildings alongside their main structures.Īfter a foray over the air you might come home to find your base map has expanded again and you need to rove out further or defend against attackers. Once you’re done and you come home, your base is just as you left it (except with all those new units parked up, of course). While some of these excursions must be completed with only the ten units you put on board, dungeon crawl style, others allow you to continue managing your home base via remote - mainly to tell your factories to churn out reinforcements and bring them over in batches. No big deal.Įxcept then you are sent out to places far beyond your home base, via transport airship. Instead of telling you to replay the universe all over again in the next area, your world is extended and your tanks have to drive a little further to meet their foes. You assemble a small army of wheely gun turrets and wander out to splash the locals because… Well, they do shoot at you first. It begins simply enough: you are plopped down into a little level with a command centre and a few trucks and told to get building. The initial base area is highly defensible but a bit cramped so you’ll soon have to spread out. I see that Warzone 2100 has some rather nice answers to this problem. (And WC3 let you carry your heroes and all their items! Why were their armies always so forgetful?!) Of course these things are designed for skirmish gameplay, online player-versus-player battles where everyone must start with nothing and proceed along fair lines to ensure a balanced match, but that setup disintegrates as soon as you introduce a persistent storyline. (Hell - you can’t even take your actual soldiers with you.) Upgraded your armour in one mission? Can’t take it with you! Improved your swords? Nope, drop ’em. Every mission in Warcraft III or pretty much any big name, your army must rediscover technologies every time they enter the field. There’s a certain structure to classic RTS campaigns that has always puzzled me. Turns out that not only is it a grotty old 3D RTS, but it was open-sourced in 2004 and is now patched-up and totally free.
I replied that I had never heard of this game, let alone played it, but if it’s an a late-90s/early-00s 3D game then I’m interested. On the subject of my latest Exon video, I was told it “looks a lot like Warzone 2100“.
0 kommentar(er)
